In the type of fawning and platitudinous puff piece on Hillary Clinton you’d expect to see in the New York magazine, where the author attempted to make the Witch from Chappaqua seem almost human…
I spent several days with Hillary Clinton near the end of primary season — which, in campaign time, feels like a month, so much is packed into every hour — and I began to see why her campaign is so baffled by the disconnect. Far from feeling like I was with an awkward campaigner, I watched her do the work of retail politics — the handshaking and small-talking and remembering of names and details of local sites and issues — like an Olympic athlete. Far from seeing a remote or robotic figure, I observed a woman who had direct, thoughtful, often moving exchanges: with the Wheelers, with home health-care workers and union representatives and young parents. I caught her eyes flash with brief irritation at an MSNBC chyron reading “Bernie Sanders can win” and with maternal annoyance as she chided press aide Nick Merrill for not throwing out his empty water bottle. I saw her break into spontaneous dance with a 2-year-old who had been named after her, Big Hillary stamping her kitten heels and clapping her hands and making “Oooh-ooh-ooh” noises. I heard her proclaim, with unself-conscious joy, from the pulpits of two black churches in Philadelphia, that “this is the day that the Lord has made!” and watched the young campaign staff at her Brooklyn headquarters bounce up and down with the anticipation of getting to shake her hand.
…SHillary revealed the reason she’s struggled to clinch the nomination her party has tried to serve to her on a silver platter: Democrat voters are sexists:
The sexism is less virulent now than it was in 2008, she said, but still she encounters people on rope lines who tell her, “ ‘I really admire you, I really like you, I just don’t know if I can vote for a woman to be president.’ I mean, they come to my events and then they say that to me.” [emphasis in original]
Yeah. I’ll bet they do. But if so, who is that comes to her events? It’s certainly not Republican voters.
Of course, the Witch has a long history of casting blame for her and her husband’s failures everywhere but where it belongs. Bill’s women troubles were the fault of a “vast right-wing conspiracy” rather than the fact that he couldn’t keep his pants zipped.
Benghazi was because of a YouTube video. The FBI’s investigation into her serial mishandling of classified material on her unsecure “homebrew” server is the fault of that nasty “right-wing conspiracy” … again. I guess it’s so “vast” it never rests.
And recall that just last week the radical leftist feminist organization Emily’s list – which believes a vagina is the perfect qualifier for political office — told Hillary it was time to stop playing the vagina card. But the author of this New York magazine piece, Rebecca Traister, is an Emily’s List Clinton sycophant.
I guess running on her dismal record as a warmongering above-the-law lying grifter didn’t get her much traction either.
H/T: Breitbart.com
The post Hillary says she’s failing because Democrat voters are sexist appeared first on Personal Liberty®.
from PropagandaGuard https://propagandaguard.wordpress.com/2016/06/03/hillary-says-shes-failing-because-democrat-voters-are-sexist/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b34d1/b34d1218911b25607d0125339cb2ffe0596c2252" alt=""
from WordPress https://toddmsiebert.wordpress.com/2016/06/02/hillary-says-shes-failing-because-democrat-voters-are-sexist/
No comments:
Post a Comment