| So how did being unarmed, when they were attacked with deadly intent, work out for the UNARMED victims of “Gun Free” Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church?
Where has the cowardly Liberal-Progressive ideology of “The more helpless you are when attacked with deadly intent, the SAFER you are!” actually saved lives?
“Gun Free” Red Lake High School? – 9 slaughtered, 5 wounded
“Gun Free” Columbine? – 13 slaughtered, 21 wounded
“Gun Free” Sandy Hook? – 26 slaughtered, 2 wounded
“Gun Free” Virginia Tech? – 32 slaughtered, 17 wounded
“Gun Free” University of Arizona College of Nursing? – 3 slaughtered, 5 wounded
“Gun Free” University of Alabama (Huntsville)? – 2 slaughtered, 3 wounded
“Gun Free” Northern Illinois University? – 5 slaughtered, 17 wounded
”
Gun Free” Fort Hood 2009? – 13 slaughtered, 32 wounded
“Gun Free” Fort Hood 2014? – 3 slaughtered, 12 wounded
The “Gun Free” Century movie theater in Aurora? – 12 slaughtered, 70 wounded
The “Gun Free” Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church? – 9 slaughtered, 8 wounded
The “Gun Free” Gabby Giffords meet-n-greet? – 6 slaughtered, 13 wounded
And yes, the Gabby Giffords meet-n-greet shooting was indeed “Gun Free”, because while most of the victims COULD have been legally armed, NO ONE actually at the shooting took personal responsibility for their own safety by BEING armed.
And no, there was NO “concealed carry holder at the Gabby Giffords shooting, that ALMOST SHOT THE WRONG PERSON!”
That is simply a LIE.
By the time Joe Zamudio arrived at the shooting scene, the goblin had already been disarmed and was no longer a threat.
“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” – Albert Einstein
What “same thing” do we see being repeated “over and over again and expecting different results”?
The DISARMING of the intended VICTIMS!
|
No comments:
Post a Comment