Who exploits women more: Cruz or Trump?

Remember the old classic “King Kong”? Watch this for a reminder:

In this movie, does beauty kill the beast? Or bait the beast?

Sometimes both. But either way, King Kong was not misbehaving when he tore around Skull Island in the 1933 RKO classic. He acted on cue. The fictional film crew – the supposedly “civilized” men – caught on quick to the beast’s exaggerated rage. And more precisely, they noted what piqued it. All that tearing foes apart and ripping trees out by the roots … well, that wasn’t to be discouraged. Oh, no! Thinking men understand how to profit from the opportunities presented by the unusual, the big shows. The insulated city dwellers and ivory tower crowd eat that stuff up. The beast must be caught, not only on celluloid for cinematic posterity, but taken down for long-term exploitation. A trap must be laid!

The bait? Fay Wray.

But this would never happen today. PETA would never allow it. And real men, according to Ted Cruz, don’t attack women. But does that include using them, Ted? I wonder. Because real beasts, like the fictional filmmakers who lashed Wray’s character between two posts, do use women – even their wives.

Some political wives, however, don’t mind; or at least will grit their teeth and sign on the dotted line. Being first lady of the United States is a fat, diamond-encrusted carrot! And Heidi Cruz, the most current damsel-in-distress, has her own career to consider. Consider the details (spilled beans?) revealed here.

Yes, this movie-goer (also known as a voter) wants to know the whole plot.

Is our heroine the emboldened senior staffer who can take on bullies – maybe with a single blow? Is Heidi Cruz on board with Goldman Sachs’ policies, like the North American Union? As WND’s own Jerome Corsi reported just over a year ago, Ted Cruz has been jousting that dragon for some time. I can only imagine dinner conversation at Cruz central, since husband and wife are so bitterly opposed – either to each other’s policies, or those of Heidi’s dastardly employers who, like Fay Wray’s handlers, happen to pay her handsomely.

Heidi and Ted Cruz

One can’t help but wonder about. They did loan Ted a handsome sum to kick off his run for president, after all.

And so the plot thickens. And we haven’t even gotten to Trump, that bully, that beast!

But hey, what better way to distract from the nasty reality of a Goldman Sachs dragon – and to keep Trump from riding it – than to have the heroine clutch her pearls at the thundering bellows of this new threat. Trump, the enraged bully! The rampaging beast! No, don’t look at those spilled beans! The National Enquirer has zero experience with political exposés. And yes, King Kong can assume a superhuman control over anyone.

The “beast” Donald Trump

Our hero, Ted Cruz, however, is incapable of picking up a phone to confirm a rumor. He can’t resist taking on the role of Daddy on a debate stage or in congress. And he absolutely cannot take the easy road of denouncing a rancid ad that scandalized the brains of the helpless young men and their mothers in Utah, if only to forestall the feared retaliation of … the beast.

The director of this 2016 election drama – or maybe just the Cruz campaign – banks on the human instinct to protect helpless women. Yes, the public has been ritually beat over the head with girl- power slogans for decades. We really shouldn’t care.

It is hoped, however, that we will be so emotionally gobsmacked by fear of the phantom gorilla that we’ll forget Heidi’s vested business interests. Spin masters pray that we’ll vault over the reality that Cruz admitted his opponent’s boorish behavior is completely predictable, and land safely on the side of nominating Cruz, the would-be hero of the piece. But what kind of hero would intentionally put his wife in a position of being slammed in a predictable reprisal? And by a rage-crazed gorilla, no less?

A politician! That’s who. Best get that jumbo popcorn refilled during intermission. There’s plenty more excitement to come!

Admit it … modern art is ugly

Watch this superb analysis of art. It won’t take long, and it’s fascinating:

Did that last painting in the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art move you? Me, too! Quite the eye-opener as to why American culture has degraded. Think about it: the goal of the “art community” seems to be unhinging our minds from any standards and erasing the influences of the “grand masters” that came before us, so all that remains is a white space, a blank slate. Kind of like that white “painting” depicted at the end of the video. This “blankness” allows an artist – God help us – to create his or her own reality.

Let’s build a temple to … murdered babies!

Speaking of really really bad art, some of you might remember the movie “Ghostbusters” with the demonic “Temple of Gozer”:

Relax, there is no Temple of Gozer in New York City, at least not yet. But the Big Apple is building its own demonic temple, this time a full-scale replica of the 50-foot entry arch to the one-time Temple of Baal.

Yes, Baal – the god of child sacrifice and sexual free-for-alls – is coming to Times Square in April of 2016. Lest we be the envy of those across the pond, a second replica is also slotted to adorn London’s Trafalgar Square.

Temple of Baal in Palmyra, Syria

The Temple Arch project is lauded as a rejection of fundamentalism, the idea being to preserve history and culture despite the destructive forces of ISIS (yet another group intent on erasing history so they can fill in the gaping blank).

According to New York Times’ Sunday Review columnist, Kanishk Tharoor, the original Temple of Baal was converted over the centuries to a Byzantine church, then a mosque, and subsequently relegated to being just part of Palmyra’s cityscape.

Oddly enough, also in August of last year, Sarakshi Rai of FirstPost reported that the “Goddess Kali took over New York City last week, quite literally, and it’s breathtaking!”

New York City projected the week-long spectacle of the Hindu Goddess Kali on the Empire State building. It was a “visual feast,” according to reports. Change, power and destruction are but a sampling of the goddess’s purported attributes. Fabulous, right? Breathtaking? You bet. But whether it’s joy or dread stealing the oxygen from your lungs depends on what news source you plumb, what spin is in vogue, as well as what the people are led to want or think they must need.

And what people seem to want, especially with the alphabet of life being purposefully robbed from them, one letter at a time, is to be told what to think. This new “white space” of orchestrated confusion is our culture. The agenda is to forget what precisely came before, what still is, what things really mean and what will come again.

For example, watch this young woman’s “understanding” of Jesus and Baal:

This well-intended, but truly disturbing, observation about Baal worship and Christianity is the legacy we’ll leave our children. It’s also the legacy we’ll have to answer for if we’re not very serious about instructing the ignorant – including ourselves.

After all, we are the generation that laughed at Ghostbusters and the farce Temple of Gozer – soon to be revisited in a switched-up version featuring women. But what is our society now – really – but awash with child sacrifice and sexual misbehavior marketed as normal? Scary stuff!

from PropagandaGuard https://propagandaguard.wordpress.com/2016/03/29/who-exploits-women-more-cruz-or-trump/

from WordPress https://toddmsiebert.wordpress.com/2016/03/28/who-exploits-women-more-cruz-or-trump/