Revelations from a stunning AP investigation showing more than half of the visitors to Hillary Clinton’s State Department office from outside government paid money to the Clinton Family Foundation for the privilege are raising the profile of those long-simmering questions about whether her “reset” with Russia actually was a “sellout.”
AP’s report on the results of its years-long review of visitors to Clinton’s State office, and those who gave money to her private family foundation, which she, husband Bill and daughter Chelsea run, understated, “It’s an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president.”
The possibility of cash-for-access already had been raised, in connection with Russia, its tech development efforts, and American secrets, by Peter Schweizer, the author of “Clinton Cash,” and the president of the Government Accountability Institute.
Just a couple of weeks ago, he wrote in the Wall Street Journal that tens of millions of dollars in donations came in to the Clinton Foundation while America’s top high-tech firms were working to develop a high-tech industry inside Russia through a program Clinton was pursuing.
But at the same time, he wrote, the FBI warned that Russia possibly was gaining access to America’s “dual-use technologies,” those that could be used in business – but also play a key strategic role in military applications.
He cited the American companies’ work with the Skolkovo Foundation, whose vice president, Conor Lenihan, a previous partner with the Clinton Foundation, reported the Russian effort to boost tech development had assembled “29 Russian, American and European ‘Key Partners.’”
“Of the 28 ‘partners,’ 17, or 60 percent, have made financial commitments to the Clinton Foundation, totaling tens of millions of dollars, or sponsored speeches by Bill Clinton,” he wrote.
Schweizer pointed that Russians linked to Skolkova and the flow of funds to the Clintons included Andrea Vavilov of SuperOx, “part of Skolkovo’s nuclear-research cluster,” and billionaire “Putin confidant” Viktor Vekselberg, who gave money to the Clintons through his company, Renova Group.
“Amid all the sloshing of Russia rubles and American dollars, however, the state-of-the-art technological research coming out of Skolkovo raised alarms among U.S. military experts and federal law-enforcement officials. Research conducted in 2012 on Skolkovo by the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth declared that the purpose of Skolkovo was to serve as a ‘vehicle for world-wide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.’”
Schweizer continued, quoting the report, “the Skolkovo Foundation has, in fact, been involved in defense-related activities since December 2011, when it approved the first weapons-related project – the development of a hypersonic cruise missile engine. . . . Not all of the center’s efforts are civilian in nature.”
The FBI even went to the effort to place an op-ed in the Boston Business Journal noting it had warned tech and other companies. “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by their government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies.”
It continued, “The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application.”
This all followed on Hillary Clinton’s “reset” with Russia, which included efforts to support Skolkova, which Schweizer described as an “‘innovation city’ of 30,000 people on the outskirts of Moscow.
While Russia committed $5 billion to the “Silicon Valley” copy, “Mrs. Clinton’s State Department worked aggressively to attract U.S. investment partners and helped the Russian State Investment Fund, Rusnano, identify American tech companies worth of Russian investment.
“Soon, dozens of U.S. tech firms, including top Clinton Foundation donors like Google, Intel … and Cisco … made major financial contributions to Skolkova, with Cisco committing a cool $1 billion.”
Schweizer pointed out the difficulty.
“Even if it could be proven that these tens of millions of dollars in Clinton Foundation donations by Skolkovo’s key partners played no role in the Clinton State Department’s missing or ignoring obvious red flags about the Russian enterprise, the perception would still be problematic.
“What is known is that the State Department recruited and facilitated the commitment of billions of American dollars in the creation of a Russian ‘Silicon Valley’ whose technological innovations include Russian hypersonic cruise-missile engines, radar surveillance equipment, and vehicles capable of delivering airborne Russian troops.”
The new AP investigation results showed the 85 “donors” it identified contributed as much as $156 million to the Clintons.
AP reported donors who were granted time with Clinton included:
- an internationally known economist who asked for her help as the Bangladesh government pressured him to resign from a nonprofit bank he ran;
- a Wall Street executive who sought Clinton’s help with a visa problem;
- Estee Lauder executives who were listed as meeting with Clinton while her department worked with the firm’s corporate charity to counter gender-based violence in South Africa.
AP said, “The frequency of the overlaps [of those meeting Clinton and those contributing money] shows the intermingling of access and donations, and fuels perceptions that giving the foundation money was a price of admission for face time with Clinton. Her calendars and emails released as recently as this week describe scores of contacts she and her top aides had with foundation donors.”
The report said Clinton also met with representatives of at least 16 foreign governments that donated as much as $170 million to the Clinton charity, but they were not included in AP’s calculations because such meetings would presumably have been part of her diplomatic duties.
Meanwhile, an investigation of the Clinton Foundation’s $140 million in grants and pledges in the year 2013 found that only $9 million went to direct aid to charities. The bulk of its revenues went to administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family and friends.
On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on “conferences, conventions and meetings”; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. None of the Clintons is on the payroll, but they do enjoy first-class flights paid for by the foundation.
So far, some 6,000 donors have given the organization about $2 billion.
from PropagandaGuard https://propagandaguard.wordpress.com/2016/08/24/was-hillarys-russian-reset-really-a-sellout/
from WordPress https://toddmsiebert.wordpress.com/2016/08/24/was-hillarys-russian-reset-really-a-sellout/
No comments:
Post a Comment